|
Posted by Marc Levenson on July 7, 2005, 2:16 am
Please log in for more thread options
I like variety, and if you aren't interesting in schooling fish, you can
still have quite a bit of diversity if you only have one or two large
fish. Zero large fish would be ideal if you want to see the little guys
more.
Marc
Mark Elliott wrote:
> I've tried small shoals (chromis, anthias) and always ended up with one fish
> so I guess that way would be best avoided.
>
> I'm not keen on simply having one or two very large fish in a reef -
> previously I had two tangs, a flame angel, a foxface and some smaller fish,
> but I'd be tempted to reduce the "big fish" element from four to one or two.
>
> Mark
>
>
>>What do you prefer? Larger fish like Tangs, or lots of tiny fish perhaps?
>>
>>Marc
>>
>>
>>Mark Elliott wrote:
>>
>>>I recently had a wipe out and lost all my fish - the corals are OK
>>>though.
>>>
>>>So, I've now got a 60*24*20 reef tank plus large sump (with DSB) and no
>>>fish.
>>>
>>>What would you stock with?
>>>
>>>Mark
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>--
>>Personal Page: http://www.sparklingfloorservice.com/oanda/index.html
>>Business Page: http://www.sparklingfloorservice.com
>>Marine Hobbyist: http://www.melevsreef.com
>
>
>
--
Personal Page: http://www.sparklingfloorservice.com/oanda/index.html
Business Page: http://www.sparklingfloorservice.com
Marine Hobbyist: http://www.melevsreef.com
| 
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML Sitemap
>
> So, I've now got a 60*24*20 reef tank plus large sump (with DSB) and no
> fish.
>
> What would you stock with?
>
> Mark
>
>
>